D not meet the definition for “miRNA-high”. Solid line represents trend

D not meet the definition for “miRNA-high”. Solid line represents trend line of the miRNA-high patient subset, dotted line represents trend lineCirculating MiRNAs and Hypoxia in Prostate Cancerwere confirmed to be significantly elevated in mCRPC cases compared with controls (miR-141: P,0.0001, miR-200a: P = 0.007, miR-200c: P = 0.017, miR-375: P = 0.009, and miR210: P = 0.022, Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis). The average folddifference between cases and controls ranged from 4.6 (miR-375) to 27.9 (miR-141) (Fig. 1B, upper and Table S1). In addition, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots demonstrate the capacity of these miRNAs to discriminate between the two groups (miR-141 Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.899; miR-200a AUC = 0.699; miR-375 AUC = 0.773; INCB-039110 biological activity miR-200c AUC = 0.721 and miR-210 AUC = 0.678) (Fig. 1B, lower). Importantly, we verified that control miRNAs were not differentially expressed between the two populations (Fig. S1). To validate these findings in an independent specimen set collected at a different institution, we measured miR-141, miR200a, miR-200c, miR-375 and miR-210 from the sera of an additional 21 mCRPC patients and 20 age-matched healthy controls collected at the University of Michigan. All five miRNAs were elevated in sera from mCRPC cases relative to controls in this independent validation set. MiR-141, miR-375 and miR210 were significant at a P-value threshold of ,0.01 in the second cohort (P = 0.001, P = 0.021, P = 0.022, respectively) and miR200a and miR-200c tended toward significance (P = 0.073, P = 0.055, respectively) (Fig. 1C, upper). ROC I-BRD9 curves were generally concordant between the specimen sets from the two institutions (Fig. 1C, lower). Analysis of serum miRNA markers in various combinations demonstrated that adding additional miRNAs to serum miR-141 (which had the best performance alone) did not improve the ability to distinguish between cases and controls (data not shown). Consistent with this observation, we found that among cancer cases in which expression of miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, and miR-375 was higher than all healthy controls, these miRNAs were also significantly correlated with each other and with serum PSA (Table S2). In contrast, miR210 did not show significant correlation with any of these four miRNAs (Table S3) nor with serum PSA, suggesting that it provides distinct information about disease biology. To determine whether the five serum miRNA markers of mCRPC are expressed in prostate cancer tissue and could therefore be plausibly cancer cell-derived, we measured their expression in epithelial cells that had been laser capture microdissected from primary prostate cancer tissues (n = 8) and lymph node metastases (n = 8). We detected miR-141, miR-200a, miR200c, miR-375 and miR-210 in all tissue types evaluated (Table S3), suggesting that these five miRNAs, when found in the circulation, may originate from prostate cancer, although other additional sources cannot be excluded. Three of the serum prostate cancer-associated miRNAs identified (miR-141, miR-200a and miR-200c) are epithelialspecific, highly related in sequence and have known roles in maintaining 23977191 the epithelial state by suppression of the epithelial-tomesenchymal transition [4]. We hypothesize that elevated circulating levels of miR-141, miR-200a and miR-200c reflect the epithelial origin of prostate cancer cells. The presence of elevated circulating miR-141 and miR-375 in mCRPC patients has also been observed in recent.D not meet the definition for “miRNA-high”. Solid line represents trend line of the miRNA-high patient subset, dotted line represents trend lineCirculating MiRNAs and Hypoxia in Prostate Cancerwere confirmed to be significantly elevated in mCRPC cases compared with controls (miR-141: P,0.0001, miR-200a: P = 0.007, miR-200c: P = 0.017, miR-375: P = 0.009, and miR210: P = 0.022, Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis). The average folddifference between cases and controls ranged from 4.6 (miR-375) to 27.9 (miR-141) (Fig. 1B, upper and Table S1). In addition, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots demonstrate the capacity of these miRNAs to discriminate between the two groups (miR-141 Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.899; miR-200a AUC = 0.699; miR-375 AUC = 0.773; miR-200c AUC = 0.721 and miR-210 AUC = 0.678) (Fig. 1B, lower). Importantly, we verified that control miRNAs were not differentially expressed between the two populations (Fig. S1). To validate these findings in an independent specimen set collected at a different institution, we measured miR-141, miR200a, miR-200c, miR-375 and miR-210 from the sera of an additional 21 mCRPC patients and 20 age-matched healthy controls collected at the University of Michigan. All five miRNAs were elevated in sera from mCRPC cases relative to controls in this independent validation set. MiR-141, miR-375 and miR210 were significant at a P-value threshold of ,0.01 in the second cohort (P = 0.001, P = 0.021, P = 0.022, respectively) and miR200a and miR-200c tended toward significance (P = 0.073, P = 0.055, respectively) (Fig. 1C, upper). ROC curves were generally concordant between the specimen sets from the two institutions (Fig. 1C, lower). Analysis of serum miRNA markers in various combinations demonstrated that adding additional miRNAs to serum miR-141 (which had the best performance alone) did not improve the ability to distinguish between cases and controls (data not shown). Consistent with this observation, we found that among cancer cases in which expression of miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, and miR-375 was higher than all healthy controls, these miRNAs were also significantly correlated with each other and with serum PSA (Table S2). In contrast, miR210 did not show significant correlation with any of these four miRNAs (Table S3) nor with serum PSA, suggesting that it provides distinct information about disease biology. To determine whether the five serum miRNA markers of mCRPC are expressed in prostate cancer tissue and could therefore be plausibly cancer cell-derived, we measured their expression in epithelial cells that had been laser capture microdissected from primary prostate cancer tissues (n = 8) and lymph node metastases (n = 8). We detected miR-141, miR-200a, miR200c, miR-375 and miR-210 in all tissue types evaluated (Table S3), suggesting that these five miRNAs, when found in the circulation, may originate from prostate cancer, although other additional sources cannot be excluded. Three of the serum prostate cancer-associated miRNAs identified (miR-141, miR-200a and miR-200c) are epithelialspecific, highly related in sequence and have known roles in maintaining 23977191 the epithelial state by suppression of the epithelial-tomesenchymal transition [4]. We hypothesize that elevated circulating levels of miR-141, miR-200a and miR-200c reflect the epithelial origin of prostate cancer cells. The presence of elevated circulating miR-141 and miR-375 in mCRPC patients has also been observed in recent.