Theta and lysenin derivatives) and multimeric toxin subunits (e.g. cholera

Theta and lysenin derivatives) and multimeric toxin subunits (e.g. cholera toxin B subunit). The multivalence and large size of the latter could induce changes in membrane properties and biochemical response. For instance, cross-linking of GM1 by the pentameric CTxB has been shown to induce changes in membrane phase Oxaliplatin dose behavior: in GUVs exhibiting one phase, addition and binding of CTxB induce lipid reorganization into coexisting fluid phases whatever the membrane was initially in Lo or Ld phase. Such phase separation was not due to CTxB self-aggregation but rather caused by GM1 cross-linking [119]. It should be however noted that this observation has been obtained in model membranes with defined lipid composition, devoid of proteins and cytoskeleton. Among other multimeric toxin fragments, one can also mention another member of the twocomponent toxin family, the Shiga toxin. The Shiga toxin B subunit is pentameric and each monomer has three binding sites to the glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide Gb3. Such toxin fragment, able to bind up to 15 Gb3, is not suitable to study lipid distribution. Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that addition of Shiga toxin B subunit induces changes in domain size and shape as well as lipid orientation in model membranes containing 1 Gb3 at a temperature above the phase transition [120]. In contrast, toxin fragments, such as theta or lysenin derivatives, are presumably monomeric due to removal of the domain involved in toxin oligomerization (Sections 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.1.2). Regarding the interference of the probe size, we expect a minor, if any, perturbationProg Lipid Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCarquin et al.Pageon lipid binding specificity and on lipid membrane organization. Indeed, we recently demonstrated binding specificity of lysenin and theta fragments, with size much larger than endogenous lipids ( 40kDa vs 300-800Da), using defined-composition liposomes [26, 29]. Such experiment suggested that steric hindrance of the probe does not prevent binding specificity. Moreover, we have shown by double labeling experiment at the RBC PM that non-saturating concentration of the large lysenin toxin PF-04418948 web fragment ( 45kDa; projected diameter 15 times larger than endogenous SM) reveals the same submicrometric domains as upon insertion of BODIPY-SM (with a size similar to SM), independently from the order of labeling [26]. These data suggest that lysenin fragment does not trigger but rather reveals membrane organization into SM-enriched submicrometric domains. Likewise, the use of EGF-ferritin ( 450kDa ferritin moiety) has been validated to authentically mimic 75-fold smaller EGF molecule [121]. Whereas minor perturbations are expected on binding specificity, the large probe size could nevertheless affect lipid properties such as lateral diffusion. This has been evidenced by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of submicrometric domains at the RBC PM labeled by lysenin fragment and BODIPY-SM: the fluorescence recovery is thrice slower for toxin fragment as compared to BODIPY-SM, a difference that could be attributed to the larger size and/or steric hindrance of the toxin probe [26]. 3.1.2. Fluorescent proteins with phospholipid binding domain–Besides toxin fragments, other probes are based on protein domains able to bind endogenous phospholipids. These can be either (i) expressed in the cytosol, bein.Theta and lysenin derivatives) and multimeric toxin subunits (e.g. cholera toxin B subunit). The multivalence and large size of the latter could induce changes in membrane properties and biochemical response. For instance, cross-linking of GM1 by the pentameric CTxB has been shown to induce changes in membrane phase behavior: in GUVs exhibiting one phase, addition and binding of CTxB induce lipid reorganization into coexisting fluid phases whatever the membrane was initially in Lo or Ld phase. Such phase separation was not due to CTxB self-aggregation but rather caused by GM1 cross-linking [119]. It should be however noted that this observation has been obtained in model membranes with defined lipid composition, devoid of proteins and cytoskeleton. Among other multimeric toxin fragments, one can also mention another member of the twocomponent toxin family, the Shiga toxin. The Shiga toxin B subunit is pentameric and each monomer has three binding sites to the glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide Gb3. Such toxin fragment, able to bind up to 15 Gb3, is not suitable to study lipid distribution. Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that addition of Shiga toxin B subunit induces changes in domain size and shape as well as lipid orientation in model membranes containing 1 Gb3 at a temperature above the phase transition [120]. In contrast, toxin fragments, such as theta or lysenin derivatives, are presumably monomeric due to removal of the domain involved in toxin oligomerization (Sections 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.1.2). Regarding the interference of the probe size, we expect a minor, if any, perturbationProg Lipid Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptCarquin et al.Pageon lipid binding specificity and on lipid membrane organization. Indeed, we recently demonstrated binding specificity of lysenin and theta fragments, with size much larger than endogenous lipids ( 40kDa vs 300-800Da), using defined-composition liposomes [26, 29]. Such experiment suggested that steric hindrance of the probe does not prevent binding specificity. Moreover, we have shown by double labeling experiment at the RBC PM that non-saturating concentration of the large lysenin toxin fragment ( 45kDa; projected diameter 15 times larger than endogenous SM) reveals the same submicrometric domains as upon insertion of BODIPY-SM (with a size similar to SM), independently from the order of labeling [26]. These data suggest that lysenin fragment does not trigger but rather reveals membrane organization into SM-enriched submicrometric domains. Likewise, the use of EGF-ferritin ( 450kDa ferritin moiety) has been validated to authentically mimic 75-fold smaller EGF molecule [121]. Whereas minor perturbations are expected on binding specificity, the large probe size could nevertheless affect lipid properties such as lateral diffusion. This has been evidenced by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of submicrometric domains at the RBC PM labeled by lysenin fragment and BODIPY-SM: the fluorescence recovery is thrice slower for toxin fragment as compared to BODIPY-SM, a difference that could be attributed to the larger size and/or steric hindrance of the toxin probe [26]. 3.1.2. Fluorescent proteins with phospholipid binding domain–Besides toxin fragments, other probes are based on protein domains able to bind endogenous phospholipids. These can be either (i) expressed in the cytosol, bein.