Iodicity has been shown earlier: Evans and Richardson [49] have reported a

Iodicity has been shown earlier: Evans and Richardson [49] have reported a periodicity of 3? s by measuring intervals between spindle bursts, which is compatible to our results of the short-term ERD seen in the TFA maps of KCs, especially KC01 group, and in the pattern shown on individual sporadic spindles. Achermann and Borbely [50] have detected this rhythm with FFT analysis. Zygierewicz et al [37] also report the same interval between the ERDs before and after the evoked KC.Regarding a possible long-term interaction of spontaneous KCs with sleep spindles, extending to 10?5 s, our data suggest a very small effect detected on group KC01. Compared to the effect of evoked microarousals on sleep spindles reported by Halasz [13], there is no significant similar effect of spontaneous KCs on spindles. Halasz does report a pronounced long-term depression on spindle power of evoked microarousals, including responses of single KC not associated with spindles, but, interestingly, only a slight depression in their KS group, which the author defines as “K-complex followed by or intermingled with 13?4 cps sigma spindle”. Our results for spontaneous KC01, KC10 and KC11 are similar to this long-term slight depression of spindles power for evoked KS group. However, the results of our spontaneous KC00 are different from their evoked single K-complex. As for the shortterm effect, note that in the figures provided by Halasz, an ERD can be also seen almost 3 s post-stimulus. Bastien et al [36] have also examined spindle power before and after evoked KCs. In their data they did not detect differences between 4 seconds pre-stimulus and either short-term, 1.25?.25 s, or long-term, 5.26?.25 s post-stimulus effects. The differences on the methodology of the EEG 259869-55-1 analysis of these studies do not allow solid conclusions on the possible long-term effects of evoked KCs on sleep spindles and a direct comparison to our data on spontaneous KCs. These differences include our individual spindle frequency approach i.e. the use of a different frequency band as specifically measured for each subject. For example, the 14Hz used by Halasz [13] are 1655472 not included in the bands we used for 2 of our subjects (subjects 2 and 5) and the 12?4Hz used by Bastien et al [36] would not include the spindles of one subject (subject 2). Time SC-1 web resolution is also an important factor. Bastien et al [36] used a 4 s segment FFT that would probably not detect our short-term ERD and Halasz [13] used 1-s FFT, compared to our 0.25 s bins for statistical analysis and of course finer initial spectrograms. Clustering of spontaneous K complexes based on the incidence of spindles in close time proximity to KCs, may also be a factor to understanding their interactions. Our KC groups (see also Kokkinos and Kostopoulos [35]) are similar to the classification of Ehrhart et al [25] who separate KCs to those without contiguously occurring spindles and KCs with sleep spindles occurring just prior, during and just after the KC, in order to assert their relation to transient arousals. In conclusion, single spontaneous KCs that do not lead to microarousals interact with spindles only on a short time scale of about a second [35] but we could not detect long-term spindle power reduction, extending to 10?5 s, as pronounced as in the case of evoked KCs [13]. Evoked KCs that are accompanied by spindles (KS group of Halasz [13]) also do not display the longterm sustained inhibition of spindles. Our results after cluster.Iodicity has been shown earlier: Evans and Richardson [49] have reported a periodicity of 3? s by measuring intervals between spindle bursts, which is compatible to our results of the short-term ERD seen in the TFA maps of KCs, especially KC01 group, and in the pattern shown on individual sporadic spindles. Achermann and Borbely [50] have detected this rhythm with FFT analysis. Zygierewicz et al [37] also report the same interval between the ERDs before and after the evoked KC.Regarding a possible long-term interaction of spontaneous KCs with sleep spindles, extending to 10?5 s, our data suggest a very small effect detected on group KC01. Compared to the effect of evoked microarousals on sleep spindles reported by Halasz [13], there is no significant similar effect of spontaneous KCs on spindles. Halasz does report a pronounced long-term depression on spindle power of evoked microarousals, including responses of single KC not associated with spindles, but, interestingly, only a slight depression in their KS group, which the author defines as “K-complex followed by or intermingled with 13?4 cps sigma spindle”. Our results for spontaneous KC01, KC10 and KC11 are similar to this long-term slight depression of spindles power for evoked KS group. However, the results of our spontaneous KC00 are different from their evoked single K-complex. As for the shortterm effect, note that in the figures provided by Halasz, an ERD can be also seen almost 3 s post-stimulus. Bastien et al [36] have also examined spindle power before and after evoked KCs. In their data they did not detect differences between 4 seconds pre-stimulus and either short-term, 1.25?.25 s, or long-term, 5.26?.25 s post-stimulus effects. The differences on the methodology of the EEG analysis of these studies do not allow solid conclusions on the possible long-term effects of evoked KCs on sleep spindles and a direct comparison to our data on spontaneous KCs. These differences include our individual spindle frequency approach i.e. the use of a different frequency band as specifically measured for each subject. For example, the 14Hz used by Halasz [13] are 1655472 not included in the bands we used for 2 of our subjects (subjects 2 and 5) and the 12?4Hz used by Bastien et al [36] would not include the spindles of one subject (subject 2). Time resolution is also an important factor. Bastien et al [36] used a 4 s segment FFT that would probably not detect our short-term ERD and Halasz [13] used 1-s FFT, compared to our 0.25 s bins for statistical analysis and of course finer initial spectrograms. Clustering of spontaneous K complexes based on the incidence of spindles in close time proximity to KCs, may also be a factor to understanding their interactions. Our KC groups (see also Kokkinos and Kostopoulos [35]) are similar to the classification of Ehrhart et al [25] who separate KCs to those without contiguously occurring spindles and KCs with sleep spindles occurring just prior, during and just after the KC, in order to assert their relation to transient arousals. In conclusion, single spontaneous KCs that do not lead to microarousals interact with spindles only on a short time scale of about a second [35] but we could not detect long-term spindle power reduction, extending to 10?5 s, as pronounced as in the case of evoked KCs [13]. Evoked KCs that are accompanied by spindles (KS group of Halasz [13]) also do not display the longterm sustained inhibition of spindles. Our results after cluster.